You cannot call your food product "gourmet", "premium", "homemade", "homestyle" or "grandma's original recipe" if you use high-fructose corn syrup. This stuff used to be thrown away by agribusiness as a waste product, and only came into play with the artificially high price of sugar - one of the few obvious cases of Small Government Republicans consistently voting to keep the free market from running free like they claim they want. Ask anybody from another country that doesn't have the stuff in their food supply how our food tastes, and they'll tell you just how much worse our Coca Cola is unless it's near Passover.
So: tastes worse, costs less and has no redeeming social value - sounds like trash to me. Trash is not Gourmet unless it's hanging in the Guggenheim and called Art, and sometimes not even then. This isn't even counting the health effects, like rapidly expanding waistlines and increased risk of diabetes. No, the stuff is nasty. I will pay the extra penny for honest-to-Cats sugar in my food. Cats have more taste than that, and they lick each others' ears!
To those businesses big and small that have changed over from high fructose corn syrup to sugar, or never needed to make the changeover in the first place, I salute you. More to the point, I've thrown a few extra pennies your way. Now you can afford to buy that Wii for the office you've been lusting after. Or maybe the Maserati, my budget's been a bit leaner the past few weeks.
To the rest of you: I will not buy any of your items in the store that have high fructose corn syrup, and I will keep calling you nasty names until you either stop putting it in or at least have the grace and honesty to call your products "factory recipe", "mass market swill", "just like your psycho uncle used to make", "original laboratory recipe" or "the cheapest stuff we could find on the street from that Bruno guy and his brother Bob".
So: tastes worse, costs less and has no redeeming social value - sounds like trash to me. Trash is not Gourmet unless it's hanging in the Guggenheim and called Art, and sometimes not even then. This isn't even counting the health effects, like rapidly expanding waistlines and increased risk of diabetes. No, the stuff is nasty. I will pay the extra penny for honest-to-Cats sugar in my food. Cats have more taste than that, and they lick each others' ears!
To those businesses big and small that have changed over from high fructose corn syrup to sugar, or never needed to make the changeover in the first place, I salute you. More to the point, I've thrown a few extra pennies your way. Now you can afford to buy that Wii for the office you've been lusting after. Or maybe the Maserati, my budget's been a bit leaner the past few weeks.
To the rest of you: I will not buy any of your items in the store that have high fructose corn syrup, and I will keep calling you nasty names until you either stop putting it in or at least have the grace and honesty to call your products "factory recipe", "mass market swill", "just like your psycho uncle used to make", "original laboratory recipe" or "the cheapest stuff we could find on the street from that Bruno guy and his brother Bob".
no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 04:28 am (UTC)It also has the net effect of slapping Fidel Castro, because sugar is one of Cuba's biggest export cash crops and because we'd be one of their biggest customers if we traded with them.
It's yet another instance of farm subsidies that were originally intended to help out small farmers, but that now mostly go to big agribusiness. Unfortunately nobody has the political will in Congress to undo farm subsidies. It's almost as much of a third rail as Social Security.
The thing that galls me is that the crops we subsidize via farm policy are the very things we're telling Americans not to eat because they're unhealthful. This *may* yet prove to be the undoing of farm subsidies. This got attention this year when the farm bill came up for its biennial vote once again. The New York Times actually published an opinion piece about it. This may gather steam in 2009, when the bill will come up for a vote again. I hope it does.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 04:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 04:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 06:21 am (UTC)Dear Coca-cola,
Please stop killing me.
Love,
One of your most loyal fans.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 01:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 02:31 pm (UTC)I would say more, but your son is wrestling with me over my computer. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 03:08 pm (UTC)One popular item in the American Southwest is bootleg Coca-Cola that's been imported from Mexico where the bottlers use real sugar. It's available in ethnic groceries down there.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 04:59 pm (UTC)I'll be extremely happy when Polar Soda stops using the stuff for their own line of sodas.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-16 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 02:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 03:47 am (UTC)And then there is the abomination of the essentially slave labor factories in the Mariannas, which Messrs Abramoff and DeLay among others were involved in, that recruited workers from the Phillipines and China and other such places and were close to "human trafficking" in the conditions the workers found themselves in--some even were forced into prostitution for male workers in the factories (which make clothing marked "Made in the USA") and forced to have abortions. The US Attorney who started investigating had been appointed long ago by Bush I, and was -removed- from the position by Gag Order George's misadministration... his replacement was the nephew of the person who has governmental jurisdication over the region.... and the investigation dropped dead in its tracks, of course... that is a matter of public record, in federal testimony, even...
no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 03:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 05:10 am (UTC)